Juba Agreement for Peace in Sudan (Juba Peace Agreement)
Also known as: Juba Peace Agreement
A multi-track settlement between Sudan's post-revolution transitional government and armed movements from Darfur, the Two Areas and the East, integrating them into transitional power structures; implementation was derailed by the 2021 coup and the 2023 war.
Conflict Background
Following the 2019 revolution and constitutional declaration, the civilian–military transitional government prioritised peace with the armed movements, negotiating parallel regional tracks in Juba under South Sudanese mediation.
Negotiation Context
The agreement traded movement integration into national institutions for commitments on land, nomads and pastoralists, transitional justice, and Darfur's special status — but SPLM-N al-Hilu and SLM/A-Abdul Wahid stayed out.
Parties
- Transitional Government of Sudan
- Sudan Revolutionary Front coalition
- SLM/A–Minni Minnawi
- JEM (Gibril Ibrahim)
- SPLM-N (Agar wing)
- Other movements
Mediators & Guarantors
- · Government of South Sudan
- · South Sudan
- · Chad
- · Qatar
- · UAE
- · African Union
- · United Nations
- · Egypt
Key Provisions
Implementation
Formally extant but operationally suspended by the Sudan war; several signatories are now combatants. CRCA assesses the JPA as the probable scaffolding for any future Darfur and Two Areas negotiation track.
Timeline
- 2020-10-03Signed in Juba
- 2021-02Movement leaders join cabinet and Sovereignty Council
- 2021-10-25Military coup upends the transitional framework; key signatories side with the military
- 2023-04-15SAF–RSF war erupts; implementation architecture collapses
- 2024–2025Signatory movements drawn into the war on divergent sides; Darfur provisions moot amid RSF advances
Challenges
- The 2021 coup destroyed the civilian transitional counterpart to the agreement
- Security integration never executed; signatory forces remilitarised after April 2023
- Holdout movements retained the strongest constituencies in Darfur and the Nuba Mountains
Outcomes
- Briefly achieved the broadest formal inclusion of Sudan's peripheries in national government since independence
- Its Darfur land and compensation frameworks remain the reference text for any post-war settlement
Lessons
- Integrating movements into government without integrating their forces leaves the coercive landscape unchanged
- Multi-track design manages complexity but multiplies veto points
- Guarantor mediation by a neighbouring state with its own dependencies (South Sudan) has limited enforcement reach
Related CRCA Resources
References
- Transitional Government of Sudan & SRF (2020). Juba Agreement for Peace in Sudan.
- De Waal, A. (2023). commentary series on Sudan's war economy and peacemaking.
