Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS)
Also known as: R-ARCSS
A revitalized political settlement intended to end the South Sudan civil war through transitional governance arrangements, security sector reforms, constitutional processes, and power sharing among the principal belligerents.
Conflict Background
The 2013 rupture within the SPLM between President Salva Kiir and former Vice-President Riek Machar triggered a civil war fought substantially along politicised ethnic lines. The 2015 ARCSS collapsed in July 2016 when fighting returned to Juba, prompting IGAD to convene a High-Level Revitalization Forum that produced the R-ARCSS.
Negotiation Context
The war displaced roughly four million people and produced famine conditions in parts of the country. The settlement sits atop unresolved contests over the character of the state, control of oil revenues, and the relationship between national elites and communal armed mobilisation.
Parties
- Government of South Sudan (SPLM-IG)
- SPLM/A-In Opposition (SPLM/A-IO)
- South Sudan Opposition Alliance (SSOA)
- Former Detainees (FDs)
- Other Political Parties (OPP)
Mediators & Guarantors
- · IGAD
- · African Union
- · IGAD member states
- · United Nations
- · Troika (United States, United Kingdom, Norway)
Key Provisions
Implementation
As of the latest CRCA review (Q1 2026), the agreement survives formally but its power-sharing core is gravely weakened following the March 2025 house arrest of the First Vice-President and renewed SSPDF–White Army clashes in Upper Nile. Elections remain notionally scheduled for December 2026.
Timeline
- 2018-09-12Signed in Addis Ababa under IGAD auspices
- 2020-02-22R-TGoNU formed; Machar sworn in as First Vice-President
- 2022-08-04Parties adopt a Roadmap extending the transition by 24 months
- 2024-09Transition extended again; elections deferred to December 2026
- 2025-03Machar placed under house arrest; SPLM-IO suspended from key mechanisms; agreement under severe strain
Challenges
- Chronic delays in security arrangements — unified forces only partially graduated and largely undeployed
- Elite bargaining crowding out Chapter V transitional justice, which remains unimplemented
- Escalation in Upper Nile and the 2025 detention of Machar hollowing out the power-sharing core
- Fiscal opacity and oil-revenue contestation undermining wealth-sharing provisions
- Spillover pressure from the war in Sudan since April 2023
Outcomes
- Ended large-scale nationwide hostilities between the principal signatories after 2018
- Restored a functioning, if fractious, unity government in 2020
- Kept a recognised constitutional and electoral roadmap on the table
Lessons
- Power-sharing without parallel security-sector integration reproduces the conditions of relapse
- Guarantor leverage decays quickly once a unity government is seated; benchmarked conditionality is needed across the whole transition
- Excluding communal armed actors from national settlements displaces rather than ends violence
Related CRCA Resources
References
- IGAD (2018). Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan. Addis Ababa.
- Reports of the UN Secretary-General on South Sudan, S/2019–S/2026 series.
- RJMEC quarterly reports on the status of R-ARCSS implementation.
